<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Wayfaring - Latest Comments in Pink Beach Club, Bermuda</title><link>http://wayfaring.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://wayfaring.disqus.com/pink_beach_club_bermuda/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 09:52:57 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Pink Beach Club, Bermuda</title><link>http://www.wayfaring.info/2009/01/01/pink-beach-club-bermuda/#comment-21343760</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In the Senate in particular, that explanation is pretty believable. ,&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex100</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 09:52:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pink Beach Club, Bermuda</title><link>http://www.wayfaring.info/2009/01/01/pink-beach-club-bermuda/#comment-21343759</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We expect that fundamental moral   principles will prescribe equal treatment of groups singled out by these   morally irrelevant classifications, but since the classifications are   really morally irrelevant, this turns out not to be so. ,&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Maxx89</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:52:44 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>